Sifted Truth

Faith, history and the evidence beneath both

Why historians date the creed in 1 Corinthians 15 so early

Paul quotes a summary of the faith he says he “received.” Scholars across the spectrum agree it is very old. Here is why, and what that does and doesn’t establish.

Two papyrus pages with Greek text from Paul’s letters
Pages of Papyrus 46, an early copy of Paul’s letters.University of Michigan Library / Wikimedia Commons, public domain

Paul wrote 1 Corinthians in the mid-50s AD. In chapter 15, he pauses to remind the church of something he had passed on to them, something he says he had himself received. What follows in reads less like Paul’s own prose and more like a compact, memorized summary.1

The marks of an older tradition

Several features point to a formula Paul is quoting rather than composing. “Received” and “delivered” were standard terms for handing on tradition. The lines are balanced and repetitive (“and that… and that…”), the names are Aramaic forms like Cephas, and the vocabulary is unusual for Paul.2

Paul also tells us when he had the opportunity to receive it. In , he describes visiting Jerusalem three years after his conversion and staying fifteen days with Peter. Many scholars think that visit, or one close to it, is where Paul learned this summary.

What early dating does establish

If the creed was formulated within a few years of Jesus’ death, then the belief that he had died, been buried and appeared alive to named individuals and groups was not a late legend. It was there at the start, and Paul even notes that most of the five hundred witnesses were still living, an open invitation to check.3

What it doesn’t establish on its own

Early belief is not the same as a proven event. Historians who accept the early date still disagree about what the first followers experienced. Ehrman, for example, accepts that followers sincerely believed they saw Jesus but does not conclude he rose.4 The creed sets the starting point for that debate; it does not end it.

Notes

  1. Dunn, Jesus Remembered, on the resurrection traditions.↩
  2. Habermas and Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus.↩
  3. Lüdemann, The Resurrection of Jesus.↩
  4. Ehrman, How Jesus Became God.↩

Sources

  • secondaryGary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Kregel, 2004.
  • secondaryGerd Lüdemann, The Resurrection of Jesus: History, Experience, Theology. Fortress Press, 1994.
  • secondaryJames D. G. Dunn, Jesus Remembered. Eerdmans, 2003.
  • secondaryBart D. Ehrman, How Jesus Became God. HarperOne, 2014.

About the author

Shawn-Patrick Bland
Founder & Editor

Just a man searching for truth.